Legal Opinion

Foamseal, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 30, 1998No. 96-71129PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FEIKENS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CE.RC-LA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601 et seq., to recover expenses plaintiffs assumed under consent decrees entered in two companion cases both entitled United States v. BASF Corp., et al. (Case Nos. 91-40320 and 96-75279). These consent decrees obligated plaintiffs to pay a total of approximately $45 million- to remediate a landfill contaminated by hazardous waste. Plaintiffs now seek approval of settlements that will resolve their claims…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986
  2. Lyncott Corp. v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. United States v. SCA Services of Indiana, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
  4. Comerica Bank-Detroit v. Allen Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
  5. United States v. Western Processing Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Emeryville v. The Sherwin-Williams CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  3. Gurley v. CITY OF WEST MEMPHIS, ARDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API