Foamseal, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CE.RC-LA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601 et seq., to recover expenses plaintiffs assumed under consent decrees entered in two companion cases both entitled United States v. BASF Corp., et al. (Case Nos. 91-40320 and 96-75279). These consent decrees obligated plaintiffs to pay a total of approximately $45 million- to remediate a landfill contaminated by hazardous waste. Plaintiffs now seek approval of settlements that will resolve their claims…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986
- Lyncott Corp. v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- United States v. SCA Services of Indiana, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
- Comerica Bank-Detroit v. Allen Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
- United States v. Western Processing Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Emeryville v. The Sherwin-Williams CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Ford Motor Co. v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Gurley v. CITY OF WEST MEMPHIS, ARDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2007