Stearns & Foster Bedding Co. v. Franklin Holding Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Table of Contents
I.FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY l
II.STANDARD FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT l
III. DISCUSSION l
A) Private Actions Under CERCLA Section 107(a) l
B) Operator Liability Under CERCLA l(1) Introduction 00 l(2) The Actual Control Standard 00 l
Franklin’s 00 l
M & T’s l(5) Rand’s Operator Liability 00 l
of M & T and Rand 00 l
C) The Continuity of Enterprise Theory 00 l
D) The New Jersey Spill Act 00 l
E) Martin S. Orland’s Motion for Summary Judgment 00 l
F) NYCON’s Motion for Summary Judgment 0o l
G) The Nurkiewicz Defendants’ Motion to Settlement 00 I — 'I
H) The Motions to Strike 00 f-i
IV. CONCLUSION…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Compaction Systems Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Rumpke of Indiana, Inc. v. Cummins Engine Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Litgo New Jersey Inc. v. Commissioner New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining CorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.