Associated Industries of Missouri v. Director of Revenue
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge.
Appellants challenge the constitutionality of § 144.748, RSMo.Supp.1991.1 The statute imposes a flat 1.5 percent use tax for the privilege of storing, using or consuming tangible personal property in Missouri that was purchased outside the state. Appellants seek a declaration that the tax violates the commerce, due process, and equal protection clauses of the United States Constitution and the due process, equal protection and uniformity clauses of the Missouri Constitution and an injunction permanently enjoining enforcement of the statute. The trial court denied both declaratory…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Associated Industries of Mo. v. LohmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Associated Industries of Missouri v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- St. Charles County v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Rolla Manor, Inc. v. Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Medical ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Michael Jaudes Fitness Edge, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.