Legal Opinion

Associated Industries of Mo. v. Lohman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 23, 1994No. 93-397PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

The State of Missouri imposes a uniform, statewide use tax on all goods purchased outside the State and stored, used, or consumed within the State. Although the tax is purportedly designed to “compensate” for sales taxes imposed by local jurisdictions on sales of goods in the State, local sales tax rates vary widely, and in many jurisdictions the use tax exceeds the sales tax. Petitioners contend that this system discriminates against interstate commerce in violation of the Commerce Clause, even though the local sales taxes across the State may, in the aggregate, place a greater burden on…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. TracySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Camps Newfound/Owatonna, Inc. v. Town of HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Fulton Corp. v. FaulknerSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. WynneSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API