Associated Industries of Missouri v. Director of Revenue
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
LIMBAUGH, Judge.
The United States Supreme Court determined in Associated Industries of Missouri v. Lohman, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1815, 128 L.Ed.2d 639 (1994), that § 144.748, RSMo Supp.1992, which imposes a statewide 1.5% use tax as a counterpart to local sales taxes, is invalid as applied in those taxing districts where the local sales tax is less than 1.5%. In those districts, the Court explained, the use tax impermissibly discriminates against interstate commerce in violation of the Commerce Clause. In view of the Supreme Court’s ruling, we must now decide on remand whether, as a matter of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Associated Industries of Mo. v. LohmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Murphy v. BarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
- Frost v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- State v. HartSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Akin v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- BOARD OF EDUC OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.