Michael Jaudes Fitness Edge, Inc. v. Director of Revenue
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
LAURA DENVIR STITH, Chief Justice.
Michael Jaudes Fitness Edge, Inc. (“Fitness Edge”), seeks review of the decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC) holding that the fees it receives from its clients are subject to sales tax pursuant to section 144.020.1(2). 1 It argues that because the fees primarily cover the provision of personal training services, they should not be subject to tax under that section. To the contrary, the record supports the AHC’s determination that Fitness Edge’s fitness training facility is a place of recreation and that the fees paid to it are paid for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Associated Industries of Mo. v. LohmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bopp v. SpainhowerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- Columbia Athletic Club v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Spudich v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- L & R Distributing, Inc. v. Missouri Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
- Airport Tech Partners, LLP, and Stentor Company, LLP v. State of Missouri and City of Kansas City, MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
- Miss Dianna's School of Dance, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
- Tatson, LLC, d/b/a Powerhouse Gym of Joplin v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
- Miss Dianna's School of Dance, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.