Legal Opinion

Fry v. Baltimore Hotel Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1926No. Docket No. 3130PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by the defendant Colopy from a judgment for damages based upon a stockholder’s liability for the debts of a corporation for breach of contract.

Two reasons are assigned by the defendant upon which he relies for a reversal of the judgment. First, that the agreement upon which the judgment is founded was a mere renewal of a former lease, for the breach of which a stockholder’s liability was barred by the limitations prescribed in section 359 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Second, that a former judgment against the corporation, which furnished the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hunt v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Searles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Concannon v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Cook v. CeasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. London & San Francisco Bank, Ltd. v. ParrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. AldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Furman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Gardner v. ShreveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Mitchell v. Banking Corporation of Mont.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Johnson v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API