Fry v. Baltimore Hotel Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by the defendant Colopy from a judgment for damages based upon a stockholder’s liability for the debts of a corporation for breach of contract.
Two reasons are assigned by the defendant upon which he relies for a reversal of the judgment. First, that the agreement upon which the judgment is founded was a mere renewal of a former lease, for the breach of which a stockholder’s liability was barred by the limitations prescribed in section 359 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Second, that a former judgment against the corporation, which furnished the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hunt v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Searles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Concannon v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Cook v. CeasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- London & San Francisco Bank, Ltd. v. ParrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. AldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Furman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Gardner v. ShreveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Mitchell v. Banking Corporation of Mont.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
- Johnson v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.