Lundahl v. Quinn
Utah Supreme Court
1Per curiam
1 This matter comes before the court on petition for extraordinary writ. 'The petitioner, Holli Lundahl, asserts she has filed a motion to intervene and an amended counterclaim complaint on which the district court refused to rule because it deemed her a nonparty to the action. Judge Anthony Quinn filed a response, as did N.AR. Inc., Mark T. Olson, Olson & Associates, P.C., Anthony Tidwell, D.D.S., and Olympus View Dental Center as real parties in interest. We deny the petition and further hold that it is frivolous.
T2 As background to this court's order on this petition, a brief recitation of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nelson v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- ProMax Development Corp. v. RaileUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Calder Bros. Co. v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Heathman v. HatchUtah Supreme Court · 1962
- Sittner v. SchrieverUtah Supreme Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. WinfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. ValdovinosCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- Trapnell v. Legacy ResortsUtah Supreme Court · 2020
- Lundahl v. Nar Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2006
- Noble v. Am. Nat'l Prop.United States District Court · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.