ProMax Development Corp. v. Raile
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOWE, Chief Justice:
INTRODUCTION
¶ 1 Plaintiff ProMax Development Corporation appeals from a judgment dismissing its complaint against defendants Rick and Martha Raile for mechanic’s lien foreclosure, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 We state the evidence in the light most favorable to the Railes, who were the prevailing party below. During the spring of 1994, Rick and Martha Raile, a married couple, verbally agreed to hire ProMax Development Corporation to build a home for them for $300,000 excluding the lot and landscaping. The agreement was made between the Railes and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Management Services Corp. v. Development AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Golden Key Realty, Inc. v. MantasUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- MEADOWBROOK, LLC v. FlowerUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Adamson Et Ux. v. BrockbankUtah Supreme Court · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Bradbury v. ValenciaUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Lantec, Inc. v. Novell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Bakowski v. Mountain States Steel, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Bodell Construction Co. v. RobbinsUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Loffredo v. HoltUtah Supreme Court · 2001
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.