Legal Opinion

ProMax Development Corp. v. Raile

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 2000No. 980087PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 Plaintiff ProMax Development Corporation appeals from a judgment dismissing its complaint against defendants Rick and Martha Raile for mechanic’s lien foreclosure, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 We state the evidence in the light most favorable to the Railes, who were the prevailing party below. During the spring of 1994, Rick and Martha Raile, a married couple, verbally agreed to hire ProMax Development Corporation to build a home for them for $300,000 excluding the lot and landscaping. The agreement was made between the Railes and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Management Services Corp. v. Development AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Golden Key Realty, Inc. v. MantasUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. MEADOWBROOK, LLC v. FlowerUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Adamson Et Ux. v. BrockbankUtah Supreme Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Bradbury v. ValenciaUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Lantec, Inc. v. Novell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  3. Bakowski v. Mountain States Steel, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Bodell Construction Co. v. RobbinsUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Loffredo v. HoltUtah Supreme Court · 2001

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API