Legal Opinion
Lundahl v. Nar Inc.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided May 24, 2006No. 4:05 CV 00127 RCTPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation.
On April 7, 2006, this Court entered an Order to Show Cause why this Court should not enter a Vexatious Litigant Order against Plaintiff Holli Lundahl (“Lundahl” or “Plaintiff’). This Court has inherent power to “ ‘regulate the activities of abusive litigants by imposing carefully tailored restrictions under the appropriate circumstances.’ ” De Long v. Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144, 1147 (9th Cir.1990) (quoting Tripati v. Beaman, 878 F.2d 351, 352 (10th Cir.1989)). 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) also provides this Court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- De Long v. HennesseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- In re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anant Kumar Tripati v. William C. BeamanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- In Re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re Thomas D. Powell, in Re Brian BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Noble v. Am. Nat'l Prop.United States District Court · 2018
- Nelson v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2016
- Johnson v. AlbolinoDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2025
- Johnson v. Bad Boy Productions Holdings IncDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2024
- Johnson v. Bad Boy Productions Holdings IncDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.