State v. Winfield

PARRISH, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

[ 1 Defendant Carl Alton Winfield appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery, arguing that (1) the trial court's voir dire examination was inadequate to ensure an impartial jury, and (2) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his conviction. We conclude that Winfield invited the alleged error in jury selection when he affirmatively passed the jury for cause and accordingly decline to review that claim. We similarly decline to review Winfield's claim that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because he failed to preserve…