Legal Opinion
Noble v. Am. Nat'l Prop.
United States District Court
Decided February 26, 2018No. CIV. 17–5088–JLVPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JEFFREY L. VIKEN, CHIEF JUDGE
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Holli Telford and Marty Noble, appearing pro se , filed this action against the defendants. (Docket 8). The verified amended complaint includes wide-ranging allegations, and plaintiffs contend a variety of federal and state laws support their case. Id. All defendants filed motions to dismiss. Defendant Jared Eldridge ("Judge Eldridge"), a Utah state court judge, submitted a motion to dismiss based on Rules 12(b)(1), (4) & (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Docket 39). Defendant American National Property & Casualty Insurance Co.…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re Dicamba Herbicides Litig.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019
- Filimowicz v. Explorer Transport IncDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2025
- Johnson v. EricksonDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2022
- Lindberg v. DimonDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2019
- Lindberg v. DimonDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.