Legal Opinion

State v. Keerins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 9, 2005No. 02C41151; A120817PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search of his residence. He contends that the affidavit in support of the warrant failed to establish probable cause that evidence of drug dealing would be found at the residence. We affirm.

On January 25,2002, Keizer Police Officer Goodman submitted an application for a warrant to search defendant’s residence for evidence of possession and delivery of controlled substances. The application included an affidavit, that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. CastroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. GaskillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. GaskillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API