Legal Opinion

State v. Huff

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 15, 2012No. 09CR1052; A145156PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for one count each of unlawful delivery of methamphetamine (Count 1), ORS 475.890, and unlawful possession of methamphetamine (Count 2), ORS 475.894, both as commercial drug offenses, ORS 475.900(l)(b).1 He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search of his residence on the ground that the affidavit in support of the warrant was insufficient to establish probable cause for the warrant to issue.2 We agree and, therefore, reverse and remand on those counts.

The facts, as they pertain to the issue…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Michigan v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. State v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SundermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. FriddleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. KlinglerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. State v. MiserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API