State v. Russell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*263LEESON, J.
The state appeals the trial court’s order suppressing evidence seized during execution of a search warrant. The trial court ruled that the supporting affidavit did not establish probable cause. We affirm.
The affiant is a detective with the Jackson County Narcotics Enforcement Team (JACNET). His affidavit states that in August, 1991, JACNET received an anonymous letter urging officers to “go to 872 Old Trail Creek road [sic] in the town of Trail and you will find 25,50 or more pot plants being grown there in the barn.” Later that month, JACNET received a second anonymous letter that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. AnspachOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MoylettOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. CarlileOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. Carter/GrantOregon Supreme Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. PoppeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. KeerinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. ApoloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.