Legal Opinion

McGregor v. Donelly

California Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1885No. 8967PublishedCited by 10 opinions

' Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

In this case the evidence shows, and it is substantially found, that by an arrangement made between John McGregor,, plaintiff’s testator, and H. S. Soule, the former made an affidavit and application for the purchase from the State of certain swamp and overflowed lands, lying in the county of Humboldt, for the use and benefit of the latter. Soule was to pay the cost and expense attendant on the application to purchase, and such cost and expense were either paid by him, or by Ryan claiming under him. To state the facts more particularly, Soule paid the county surveyor all his fees, charges,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tilton v. BeecherNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Domenigoni v. Imperial Live Stock & Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Kreamer v. EarlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Ripperdan v. WeldyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Clark v. FrazierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Matthews v. LopusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API