Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Fischer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1948No. Appeal, 198PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Fine, J.,

The only question in this compensation case is whether the claimhnt, although off the premises, was actually engaged in the furtherance of the business of his employer when injured- The referee, concluding the injury occurred during the course of employment, made an award which was affirmed by the board and by the court below. Tbe employer and tbe insurance carrier have appealed from tbe judgment on tbe compensation award. We will summarize sucb of tbie uncontradicted facts as are relevant to tbe disputed question.

James N. Coleman, claimant, on November 19,1945, was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Callihan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Shoffler v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Flucker v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Palko v. Taylor-Mccoy C. C. Co. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Paulin v. Williams Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rybitski v. LebowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Combs v. Cole Brothers Circus, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Susman v. Kaufmann's Department StoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Spry v. PoltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Sylvester v. PerusoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API