Legal Opinion

Shoffler v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1927No. Appeal, 53PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice, Kephart,

At the head of the slope of an anthracite mine belonging to appellant, there were two parallel narrow gauge mine tracks, connected by a cross-over switch. Both tracks led to the head or mouth of the slope, from which loaded cars, run by gravity, were collected on one of the tracks and taken by a mine locomotive to a distant point where the coal was prepared. The same locomotive hauled empty cars to the rim of the “dish” on the other track, whence they were led down to the depression or “dish” by gravity, and from there by rope haulage to the head of the slope.

Dec…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Callihan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Dzikowska v. Superior Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Palko v. Taylor-Mccoy C. C. Co. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Hale v. Savage Fire Brick Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Rich Hill Coal Company v. BashoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Ætna Life Insurance v. CarrollSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  4. Dickey v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Paul Gima v. the Hudson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API