Legal Opinion

Sylvester v. Peruso

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1981No. 1008PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATKINS, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County, Civil Division, which granted the defendants’ motions for a summary judgment. The court below held that the plaintiff was precluded from maintaining a civil action against appellees because her sole remedy was under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

On May 20, 1977, plaintiff Carmel Sylvester was injured while a passenger in an automobile owned by defendants Angelo Peruso and Aldis Peruso, trading as Stylecraft Fashions, Inc. and operated by Carl DeLuca. Both DeLuca and Carmel Sylvester were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. APPLE v. ReichertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Susman v. Kaufmann's Department StoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Kramer v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Coleman v. FischerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ducaji v. DennisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. National Casualty Co. v. KinneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Wachs v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Helinek v. HelinekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Ducjai v. DennisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API