Callihan v. Montgomery
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 189, Oct. T., 1921, by defendant, from judgment of O. P. Butler Co., Sept.'T., 1921, No. 135, sustaining decision of Workmen’s Compensation Board which affirmed award of referee, in case of Ida Callihan v. Noble Montgomery. Appeal from decision of Workmen’s Compensation Board affirming award of referee. Before Reiber, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Decision affirmed. Defendant appealed. Error assigned, inter alia, was order, quoting it.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chipe Justice Moschzisker,
Defendant, operating an oil well, employed plaintiff’s husband, O. F. Callihan, a skilled mechanic, engaged in business for himself, to repair an engine used to run a pump, under agreement to pay the latter his customary charge of $1.25 an hour for the time required to make the repairs; during the progress of this work it was found necessary to take the cylinder of the engine to Callihan’s shop for reboring. After waiting a few minutes for a representative of defendant to get ready to transport Mm, Callihan, for some undisclosed reason, stepped into an…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Flucker v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Dzikowska v. Superior Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Gaynor's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Shoffler v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Sgattone v. Mulholland & Gotwals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Johnston v. Payne-Yost Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Anderson v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.