Legal Opinion

Spry v. Polt

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1958No. Appeal, 26PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

In this workmen’s compensation case, claimant’s decedent was fatally injured while operating his truck on the public highway. Finding that, at the time of the accident, decedent was engaged in furthering his employer’s business, the Referee made an award, which was affirmed by the Board. Upon appeal to the Court of Common Pleas, a decree was entered affirming the decision of the Board. This appeal followed. The factual situation appears in the following excerpt from the opinion of the Board:

“The decedent was employed as a plumber by defendant at an average wage of $68.00…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cronin v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Eberle v. Union Dental Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Rybitski v. LebowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Combs v. Cole Brothers Circus, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Susman v. Kaufmann's Department StoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Testing Laboratories v. KielIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Port Authority v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Henry v. Lit Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Guzik v. Laurel Ridge Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Wolfingbarger v. Addressograph-Multigraph Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API