Legal Opinion

Thompson v. E.I.G. Palace Mall, LLC

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] The owners of a restaurant sought a judgment declaring that they had the right to use an adjacent mall parking lot for customer parking and truck deliveries. The trial court granted summary judgment to the mall owner. Because there are genuine issues of material fact on the question of an implied easement for access by delivery trucks, we reverse and remand that question for trial. In all other respects, we affirm.

Background

[¶2.] The plaintiffs are the owners of Fanny Horner’s Eating Establishment in Mitchell, South Dakota. 1 The restaurant lies adjacent to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ward v. LangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Wolff v. Secretary of the South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks DepartmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Steiner v. County of MarshallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. First Church of Christ v. RevellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Granite Properties Ltd. Partnership v. MannsIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Rotenberger v. BurghduffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Hoffman v. Bob Law, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Ehlebracht v. Deuel Cnty. Pln. Comm'n and Crowned Ridge Wind II, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. HAMAD ASSAM CORP. v. NovotnySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API