Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Steiner v. County of Marshall

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1997No. NonePublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Arthur Steiner, Thomas Steiner, Donna Allen, and James Pitzl (Landowners) sued Marshall County (County), seeking to enjoin County from obstructing the flow of water through County Highway 5 (Fort Road). Marshall-Brown Crow Creek Landowners Association, Inc. (Intervenor) filed a motion to intervene which was granted. Landowners and County eventually entered into a consent judgment which was approved by the trial court. The trial court dismissed the claims and defenses of Intervenor. In-tervenor appeals and we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

[¶ 2.] The land and water…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hunt v. HuntSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Mulder v. TagueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Johnson v. Kreiser's, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Sherburn v. Patterson Farms, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Block v. DrakeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Yankton Ethanol, Inc. v. Vironment, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Baker v. AtkinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Knodel v. Kassel TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API