Rotenberger v. Burghduff
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Lex Burghduff (Burghduff) appeals from a circuit court decision that declared William Rotenberger (Rotenber-ger) had a prescriptive easement across Burghduffs property. He appeals and raises two issues. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Rotenberger owns two parcels of property 1 in Harding County, which are separated by an 80-acre parcel 2 owned by Burghduff. Rotenbergér bought the land in 1984 from Neil Ketchum (Ketchum). While Ketchum owned the land, he used a trail 3 that runs over Burghduffs land to access his land. He used the trail from 1943 or 1944 to 1984. From 1984 until…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ward v. LangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Deadwood v. Summit, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Adams v. RockwellCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
- State ex rel. Goodgion v. LatimerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
- Lehman v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Healy Ranch v. MinesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Judd v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- Underhill v. MattsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Helleberg v. EstesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Fuoss v. Dahlke Family Limited PartnershipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.