Legal Opinion

Rotenberger v. Burghduff

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2007No. 24143PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Lex Burghduff (Burghduff) appeals from a circuit court decision that declared William Rotenberger (Rotenber-ger) had a prescriptive easement across Burghduffs property. He appeals and raises two issues. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Rotenberger owns two parcels of property 1 in Harding County, which are separated by an 80-acre parcel 2 owned by Burghduff. Rotenbergér bought the land in 1984 from Neil Ketchum (Ketchum). While Ketchum owned the land, he used a trail 3 that runs over Burghduffs land to access his land. He used the trail from 1943 or 1944 to 1984. From 1984 until…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ward v. LangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. City of Deadwood v. Summit, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Adams v. RockwellCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  4. State ex rel. Goodgion v. LatimerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  5. Lehman v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Healy Ranch v. MinesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Judd v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  3. Underhill v. MattsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Helleberg v. EstesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Fuoss v. Dahlke Family Limited PartnershipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API