Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Bob Law, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 2016No. 27748PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] A homeowner whose fixtures encroached on adjoining landowner’s property sued for an implied easement to keep the encroachments on the adjoining property. The adjoining landowner counter claimed for trespass and sought a mandatory injunction to compel removal of the encroachments. The circuit court denied the homeowner’s claim for an implied easement. On the adjoining landowner’s counterclaim, the court ruled the encroachments constituted a trespass. Nevertheless, the court denied'the adjoining landowner’s request for a mandatory injunction to remove the encroachments.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Christensen v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Kratze v. Independent Order of OddfellowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Magner v. BrinkmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Graven v. BackusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. The Highlands, Inc. v. HosacIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. WestphalMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Hedlund v. River Bluff Estates, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Estate of Olsen v. Agtegra Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Estate of Olsen v. Agtegra Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Heumiller v. HansenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API