Hoffman v. Bob Law, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] A homeowner whose fixtures encroached on adjoining landowner’s property sued for an implied easement to keep the encroachments on the adjoining property. The adjoining landowner counter claimed for trespass and sought a mandatory injunction to compel removal of the encroachments. The circuit court denied the homeowner’s claim for an implied easement. On the adjoining landowner’s counterclaim, the court ruled the encroachments constituted a trespass. Nevertheless, the court denied'the adjoining landowner’s request for a mandatory injunction to remove the encroachments.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Christensen v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Kratze v. Independent Order of OddfellowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Magner v. BrinkmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Graven v. BackusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- The Highlands, Inc. v. HosacIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davis v. WestphalMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- Hedlund v. River Bluff Estates, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Estate of Olsen v. Agtegra Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Estate of Olsen v. Agtegra Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Heumiller v. HansenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.