Legal Opinion

Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of Washington

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1994No. 59714-6PublishedCited by 328 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

At issue is whether information in a university researcher’s unfunded grant proposal involving use of animals in scientific research must be disclosed under the laws governing disclosure of public records. The trial court held that with excision of certain exempt information contained in the proposal, the proposal is subject to disclosure. We affirm in part and reverse in part. We affirm the trial court’s decision that the proposal is not exempt from disclosure in its entirety and hold that the exempt material was properly excised. However, because a genuine issue of fact exists as to whether…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by328 opinions

  1. Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Amren v. City of KalamaWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Amren v. City of KalamaWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Limstrom v. LadenburgWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Spokane Research & Defense Fund v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2005

323 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API