Legal Opinion

In Re Rosier

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1986No. 50589-6, 50728-7PublishedCited by 165 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

105 Wn.2d 606 (1986)

717 P.2d 1353

In the Matter of GORDON ROSIER.

SNOHOMISH COUNTY, ET AL, Appellants,

v.

PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, Respondent.

Nos. 50589-6, 50728-7.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

April 10, 1986.

Bricklin & Gendler and Michael W. Gendler, for appellant Rosier.

Seth R. Dawson, Prosecuting Attorney, John T. Dalton and Gordon W. Sivley, Deputies; Bruce Jones, City Attorney, and Grant Weed, Assistant, for appellants Snohomish County and City of Everett.

Williams, Novack & Hansen, Douglas F. Graham, and David R. Riley, for respondent.

Michael J. Killeen…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Smith v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Fritz v. GortonWashington Supreme Court · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Bering v. ShareWashington Supreme Court · 1986

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API