Legal Opinion

Hannon v. Millichamp

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1905No. 5487PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from an order of tbe superior court for Spokane county, Xennan, J., entered October 1, 1904, after a bearing on affidavits, appointing a temporary receiver upon tbe application of tbe plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

Tbis appeal is froten an order appointing a temporary receiver. The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal, and for an order affirming tbe judgment of tbe trial court, because it appears from tbe record that tbe order appealed from was made after a bearing upon tbe merits of tbe application, at wbicb time tbe court considered tbe complaint and'various affidavits of tbe respective parties; and because tbe affidavits referred to in tbe order are not in tbe record by a bill of exceptions or statement of facts. Tbe recital of tbe judgment in tbis particular is as follows:

“Tbis cause having been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Anderson v. McGregorWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Pierce v. FawcettWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilkeson v. Rector, Wardens & Vestry of St. Luke's ParishWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Du Pont Cellophane Co. v. KinneyWashington Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API