Legal Opinion

Anderson v. McGregor

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1904No. 5155PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Huston, J., entered October 13, 1903, upon a motion to dissolve a temporary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

Dunbar, J. —

This action was brought October 3, 1903, by the appellant against the respondents, the object being to obtain a permanent injunction against tbe respond*125ents, restraining them from a further commission of the acts complained of. A temporary injunction was issued hy the court, which was afterwards, on motion of the respondents, dissolved. From the judgment dissolving the injunction, this appeal is taken.

The respondents move to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that it does not appear that the superior court found upon the hearing that the party against whom the injunction was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Pierce v. FawcettWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Young v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Wilkeson v. Rector, Wardens & Vestry of St. Luke's ParishWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State ex rel. Coombs v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Hannon v. MillichampWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Du Pont Cellophane Co. v. KinneyWashington Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API