Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Fawcett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1903No. 4534PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. Thad Huston, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

— This is an action brought to recover upon a covenant of warranty, it being alleged tbat tbe grantors bad no title to the tide land conveyed. Tbe judgment was for respondent.

Tbe respondent moves to dismiss tbe appeal herein for the reason that no statement of facts has been made or preserved, showing tbe evidence or any part thereof, and tbat the findings of fact justify the judgment of the court. It is contended by tbe appellants tbat no statement of facts is necessary, in tbat it is purely a question of law which is raised by this appeal, viz,, the question of when the statute…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. McGregorWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Hannon v. MillichampWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Dibble v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API