Legal Opinion

Du Pont Cellophane Co. v. Kinney

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1935No. 25310. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to enjoin defendants from doing certain acts alleged to be in violation of a decree of the superior court of King county, under which plaintiff was adjudged to have certain exclusive rights in and to the use of the word “Cellophane,” and by which all of the defendants herein (except the state and the secretary of state) were enjoined from using that word and certain other similar words in marketing a product manufactured by them. That decree was set out in full in the complaint in this case. Among its provisions was the following •

“It is ordered . . .
“That…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Port Townsend v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Bishop v. T. Ryan Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Smith v. Dement Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Thompson v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Messick v. National Council of the Knights & Ladies of SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beaulaurier v. Washington State Hop Producers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API