Legal Opinion
Wilkeson v. Rector, Wardens & Vestry of St. Luke's Parish
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1934No. 24702. En BancPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
— This is an action for injunctive relief. From a decree favorable to defendants, plaintiff appeals.
At the outset, we are confronted with a motion to strike the statement of facts. The decree was en tered and the motion for new trial denied on March 22, 1933. The statement of facts was filed August 12th. The motion to strike the statement of facts is granted. Graham v. Carroll, 153 Wash. 222, 279 Pac. 570; Seattle Natl. Bank v. Trefethen, 168 Wash. 173, 11 P. (2d) 244.
Respondents have also interposed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The contention is that, this being a case of equitable…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Gewin v. Mt. Pilgrim Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Harbican v. ChamberlinWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- McKenzie v. . SumnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Magee v. RisleyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Niemann v. Vaughn Community ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Committee of Tort Litigants v. Catholic Diocese of Spokane (In Re the Catholic Bishop of Spokane)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 2005
- Hoffman v. Tieton View Community Methodist Episcopal ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Northeast Transportation Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- In Re Flynn's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.