Legal Opinion

Holden v. Crown Chemical Corporation

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 14, 1954No. File 79207PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.

In this action there are two plaintiffs— Artemas F. Holden and The A. F. Holden Company, a corporation. In brief, the complaint alleges that the defendant SolaMan was first employed by Holden, individually, in a business which employed trade secrets in its manufacturing process. SolaMan entered into an agreement with Holden in which he acMiowledged that Holden’s business methods were confidential and its technical matters secret and agreed not to disclose to others anything relating to the business methods or technical matters, agreed to disclose to his employer (who was doing business under…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Rutt v. RocheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Torrington Creamery, Inc. v. DavenportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  4. Bulkley v. Norwich & Westerly Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  5. Riverside Coal Co. v. American Coal Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. On-Line Technologies v. Perkin Elmer Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
  2. Perthou v. StewartDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1965
  3. Town of Groton v. MedberyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1972
  4. Cieszynski v. Franklin CorporationConnecticut Superior Court · 1964
  5. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. Clark-Barone Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API