Blakeslee v. Board of Water Commissioners
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.
This action comes before us upon a demurrer to the complaint. The first count of the complaint states the following facts: On August 23d, 1915, the plaintiffs entered into a contract with the defendant for the construction of a large dam, the price therefor being fixed in the contract at certain named sums for the various items of work to be performed. The contract provided that the work was to be completed in thirty-three months and, unless this was done, the plaintiffs were to pay the defendant as liquidated damages $100 for each day thereafter required. Both parties understood when the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- McGovern v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Lingenfelder v. Wainwright Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Linz v. SchuckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Rossignol v. Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Sage-Allen Co., Inc. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Middletown Trust Co. v. Middletown National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Rutt v. RocheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Broderick v. JackmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.