Legal Opinion

Town of Groton v. Medbery

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 8, 1972No. File No. CV 10-7204-16762PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.

This action is brought under General Statutes § 31-293 for the recovery by the plaintiff of workmen’s compensation payments to its employee, a police officer, injured in a collision with and while in pursuit of a motor vehicle stolen and operated by the defendant John G. Medbery, an uneman-cipated minor. The plaintiff also seeks recovery *672from the minor’s father, the defendant Russell S. Medbery, by authority of the parental liability law, § 52-572.

The plaintiff alleges that the minor wilfully and/or maliciously injured and damaged the police officer, known to be pursuing him, by operating a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sharkey v. SkiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  2. Rogers v. DoodySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Rutt v. RocheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  4. Lutteman v. MartinConnecticut Superior Court · 1957
  5. Holden v. Crown Chemical CorporationConnecticut Superior Court · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Motorists Mutual Insurance v. BillOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Clinton v. Aetna Life & Surety Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
  3. Crum v. GroceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  4. Hanks v. BoothSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API