Legal Opinion
Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. Clark-Barone Co.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided June 24, 1959No. File 90121PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
This is a replevin action in which the plaintiff as assignee of a conditional sales contract seeks to replevy equipment sold by The Holmes Equipment Company to the defendant. The defendant has filed an answer setting up certain defenses which basically involve allegations of breaches of warranty on the part of the vendor, The Holmes Equipment Company.
To this answer the plaintiff has replied by way of denial and plea of no knowledge, followed by the special defense to which the demurrer is addressed. The special defense refers to the basic conditional sales contract and quotes paragraphs 7 and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Rutt v. RocheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Riverside Coal Co. v. American Coal Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Libero v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Jones v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fairfield Credit Corp. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Albany Insurance v. United Alarm Services, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2002