Legal Opinion

Neal v. Health Net, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 2002No. B153290PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, P. J.

I. Introduction

In Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 283 [36 Cal.Rptr.2d 537, 885 P.2d 950], the California Supreme Court recognized the presumption that exists when a client seeks to disqualify a former lawyer in subsequent litigation. The court held: “[W]here a former client seeks to have a previous attorney disqualified from serving as counsel to a successive client in litigation adverse to the interests of the first client, the governing test requires that the client demonstrate a ‘substantial relationship’ between the subjects of the antecedent and current…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Comden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re MeadorTexas Supreme Court · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Oaks Management Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Roush v. Seagate Technology, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. O'Gara Coach Co. v. Ra, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Hetos Investments, Ltd. v. KurtinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Dino v. PELAYOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API