Neal v. Health Net, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. Introduction
In Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 283 [36 Cal.Rptr.2d 537, 885 P.2d 950], the California Supreme Court recognized the presumption that exists when a client seeks to disqualify a former lawyer in subsequent litigation. The court held: “[W]here a former client seeks to have a previous attorney disqualified from serving as counsel to a successive client in litigation adverse to the interests of the first client, the governing test requires that the client demonstrate a ‘substantial relationship’ between the subjects of the antecedent and current…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Comden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re MeadorTexas Supreme Court · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Oaks Management Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Roush v. Seagate Technology, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- O'Gara Coach Co. v. Ra, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Hetos Investments, Ltd. v. KurtinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Dino v. PELAYOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.