People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
When a conflict of interest requires an attorney’s disqualification from a matter, the disqualification normally extends vicariously to the attorney’s entire law firm. (See Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 283 [36 Cal.Rptr.2d 537, 885 P.2d 950]. (Flatt).) This rule safeguards clients’ legitimate expectations that their attorneys will protect client confidences. (Id. at pp. 283-284.) Here, we decide whether the same rule should apply when a party unknowingly consults an attorney “of counsel” to the law firm representing the party’s adversary in the subject of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Comden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by252 opinions
- Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Haworth v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Concat Lp v. Unilever, PlcDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
- People v. SuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- City & County of San Francisco v. Cobra Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.