Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1999No. S058639PublishedCited by 252 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

When a conflict of interest requires an attorney’s disqualification from a matter, the disqualification normally extends vicariously to the attorney’s entire law firm. (See Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 283 [36 Cal.Rptr.2d 537, 885 P.2d 950]. (Flatt).) This rule safeguards clients’ legitimate expectations that their attorneys will protect client confidences. (Id. at pp. 283-284.) Here, we decide whether the same rule should apply when a party unknowingly consults an attorney “of counsel” to the law firm representing the party’s adversary in the subject of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  3. Comden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by252 opinions

  1. Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Haworth v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Concat Lp v. Unilever, PlcDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
  4. People v. SuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. Cobra Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006

247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API