Hetos Investments, Ltd. v. Kurtin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOORE, J.
After a real estate transaction went awry, the parties thereto, represented by separate counsel, entered into a settlement agreement. Later, one of the parties agreed to advance settlement monies to another of the parties, but did not want to incur legal fees in connection with the documentation of the loan. Consequently, the borrower asked his law firm to prepare a promissory note documenting the terms to which he and the lender had already agreed. The law firm did so and sent the document directly to the borrower. The borrower and the lender themselves then negotiated an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Fox v. PollackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. WPS, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Adams v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Oaks Management Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- GREAT LAKES CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. BurmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Kirk v. First American Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Crenshaw v. Mony Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2004
- Roush v. Seagate Technology, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.