Holden v. Arnebergh
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Having been arrested and charged with violating section 311.2, Penal Code (exhibiting and selling obscene material), plaintiffs by their second amended complaint. first cause of action, sought a declaratory judgment that the statute as applied by the real parties in interest deprives them of rights guaranteed by the First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, United States Constitution, and that real parties be required to set up a pre-arrest censorship system by which they (plaintiffs) could submit the material in question for a determination as to its asserted obscenity prior to seizure and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Aday v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Zeitlin v. ArneberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Filarsky v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. De RenzyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- City of Tiburon v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Meyer v. AustinDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1970
- People v. Bonanza Printing Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.