Legal Opinion

Marcus v. Search Warrant of Property

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 19, 1961No. 225PublishedCited by 744 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

This appeal presents the question whether due process under the Fourteenth Amendment was denied the appellants by the application in this case of Missouri’s procedures authorizing the search for and seizure of allegedly obscene publications preliminarily to their destruction by burning or otherwise if found by a court to be obscene. The procedures are statutory, but are supplemented by a rule of the Missouri Supreme Court.1 The warrant for search for and seizure of obscene material issues on a sworn complaint filed with a judge or magis*719trate.2 If the complainant states “positively and not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by744 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

739 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API