Legal Opinion

Aday v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1961No. S. F. No. 20619PublishedCited by 166 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

— Petitioners, book publishers and distributors whose principal place of business is Fresno, applied to the District Court of Appeal for a writ of mandamus to compel the Superior Court of Alameda County to return to them property taken under an assertedly invalid search warrant. Relief was denied without opinion, and following a petition to this court for hearing we issued an alternative writ.

On September 16, 1960, Charles Ryken, a police officer from Alameda County, requested the Honorable Dan B. Eymann, Judge of the Municipal Court for the Fresno Judicial District, to issue a search…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by166 opinions

  1. Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Walker v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Ballard v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Burrows v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API