Legal Opinion

People v. De Renzy

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 1969No. Crim. 7959PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElkington, J.

This case concerns the legality of the seizure of two reels of allegedly obscene motion picture film, pursuant to the instructions of a search warrant. The pictorial content of each reel differed from the other. At the time of the seizure, their owner, defendant and appellant de Renzy, was arrested on a warrant and charged with possession of the film “with intent to . . . exhibit” the same. (Pen. Code, § 311.2.) A special proceeding taken under Penal Code section 1538.5 in the municipal court for return of the film resulted unfavorably to de Renzy who appealed the decision to the superior…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Demich, Inc. v. FerdonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. People v. EnosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Hanby v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Monica Theater v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. State v. Eros Cinema, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API