Highland v. Williams
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRobertson, C.J.
The defendant-appellant (Highland) is appealing from the trial court’s enjoining the violation of restrictive covenants on his lakeside lot and requiring the removal of his home from that lot.
Highland raises the following issues: Whether a mandatory injunction was proper under the facts of the case; whether laches barred the cause of action; whether the common scheme of development had been followed; whether the covenants forming the basis of the judgment are ambiguous and incapable of enforcement; and whether the judgment is supported by sufficient evidence.
Finding no error we affirm the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bachman v. Colpaert Realty Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1935
- Bob Layne Contractor, Inc. v. BuennagelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Schwartz v. HolycrossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
- Sorrentino v. CunninghamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Vogel v. HarlanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kranda v. Houser-Norborg Medical Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Rogers v. RogersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Watson v. ThibodeauIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Brendonwood Common v. FranklinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Renfro v. McGuyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.