Legal Opinion

Watson v. Thibodeau

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1990No. 29A04-8909-CV-411PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONOVER, Judge.

Defendants-Appellants James and Viva Watson (Watsons), pro se appeal the Hamilton Circuit Court's judgment finding the location of their sailboat cradle in Morse Reservoir to be a nuisance, mandating them to change its location, and awarding Plaintiffs-Appellees Michael and Karen Thibodeau (Thibodeaus) $1,200 in damages.

We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The Watsons present several issues which we restate as follows:

1) whether the Watsons own riparian rights because their property line abuts the shore of Morse Reservoir;

2) whether the constitution and laws of Indiana operate…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bud Wolf Chevrolet, Inc. v. RobertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. TrainaIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Briggs v. Clinton County Bank & Trust Co. of FrankfortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Indiana University v. Indiana Bonding & Surety Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Thacker v. WentzelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Amir Basic and Gerard Arthus v. Numan A. Amouri, Mohamad H. Mohajeri, Mohammad Aslam Chaudhry, Adnan Khan, Imdad Zackariya, Mohammad Sirajuddin, Sarah Shaikh, Aijaz Shaikh, Ismail Al-AniIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Boczar v. Meridian Street FoundationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Shumate v. LycanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API