Watson v. Thibodeau
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CONOVER, Judge.
Defendants-Appellants James and Viva Watson (Watsons), pro se appeal the Hamilton Circuit Court's judgment finding the location of their sailboat cradle in Morse Reservoir to be a nuisance, mandating them to change its location, and awarding Plaintiffs-Appellees Michael and Karen Thibodeau (Thibodeaus) $1,200 in damages.
We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The Watsons present several issues which we restate as follows:
1) whether the Watsons own riparian rights because their property line abuts the shore of Morse Reservoir;
2) whether the constitution and laws of Indiana operate…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Bud Wolf Chevrolet, Inc. v. RobertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. TrainaIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Briggs v. Clinton County Bank & Trust Co. of FrankfortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Indiana University v. Indiana Bonding & Surety Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Mitchell v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Thacker v. WentzelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Amir Basic and Gerard Arthus v. Numan A. Amouri, Mohamad H. Mohajeri, Mohammad Aslam Chaudhry, Adnan Khan, Imdad Zackariya, Mohammad Sirajuddin, Sarah Shaikh, Aijaz Shaikh, Ismail Al-AniIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Boczar v. Meridian Street FoundationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Shumate v. LycanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.