Legal Opinion

Sorrentino v. Cunningham

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1942No. 16,696PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlessing, J.

The appellees (plaintiffs below) brought this action for an injunction against the appellant, Philip Sorrentino and one Virgil B. Louden to restrain them from selling intoxicating beverages except for sacramental, medicinal or mechanical purposes. The action was thereafter dismissed as to the said Louden. The appellant’s place of business was and is located in the original Town of Irvington, which is now a part of the City of Indianapolis. The complaint for injunction was based upon the fact that the plat of the original Town of Irvington contained certain restrictions, in-, eluded among…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Ludgate v. SomervilleOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Bauby v. KrasowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. Bachman v. Colpaert Realty Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Dolan v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rees v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Wischmeyer v. FinchIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Murphey v. GrayArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Howard D. Johnson Co. v. Parkside Development Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Pulos v. JamesIndiana Supreme Court · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API