Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Holycross

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1925No. 12,030PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

Complaint to enjoin appellees from erecting and maintaining a building upon a certain lot in the city of South Bend in violation of the restrictions in a deed to appellees’ immediate grantor, and in violation of a zoning ordinance of said city. The facts were found specially and are, in substance, as follows:

Edgewater Place Addition in South Bend was platted by Whitcomb and Keller in 1919. In October, 1921, they conveyed lot 57 in said addition to Thomas and Emma Lee, by a warranty deed containing the following provisions ing and executing an agreement or resolution to that effect, which…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Korn v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Stewart v. FinkelstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Morrison v. WorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Chartiers Block Coal Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Jackson v. StevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Wischmeyer v. FinchIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Bachman v. Colpaert Realty Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Crossmann Communities, Inc. v. DeanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Hollingsworth v. SzczesiakCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API