Legal Opinion
Renfro v. McGuyer
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 3, 2003No. 82A01-0305-CV-184PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SULLIVAN, Judge.
Charles Renfro appeals following the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Nancy McGuyer, Shirley Parrish, Leroy Sweeney, Kathy Sweeney, Gary Stone, CHloria Stone, Sam Martin, and Marsha Martin (collectively "Homeowners"). We restate the issue presented for our review as whether the trial court erred in concluding that the Homeowners were entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law upon their claim that Renfro violated a restrictive covenant for the subdivision in which he placed his home.
We affirm.
Renfro purchased a lot in the Shady Hills No. 5…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Adult Group Properties, Ltd. v. ImlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Mislenkov v. Accurate Metal Detinning, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Hammock v. Red Gold, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Ussery Investments v. Canon & Carpenter, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
- Unincorporated Operating Division of Indiana Newspapers, Inc. v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. DawsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Applegate v. ColucciIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- One Dupont Centre, LLC v. Dupont Auburn, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Drenter v. DuitzIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. HenningsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.