Legal Opinion
Peyman Pakdel v. City and Cty. of S.F.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 17, 2020No. 17-17504PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PEYMAN PAKDEL; SIMA CHEGINI, No. 17-17504 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 3:17-cv-03638- RS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; SAN FRANCISCO OPINION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Richard Seeborg, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted September 13, 2019 San Francisco, California Filed March 17, 2020 Before: Ronald M. Gould, Carlos T. Bea, and Michelle T. Friedland, Circuit…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pakdel v. City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Lyndsey Ballinger v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Peyman Pakdel v. City and Cty. of S.F.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Brumit v. Granite City, IllinoisDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021
- Chosen Consulting, LLC v. Town Council of Highland, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.