Legal Opinion
Peyman Pakdel v. City and Cty. of S.F.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 13, 2020No. 17-17504PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PEYMAN PAKDEL; SIMA CHEGINI, No. 17-17504 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 3:17-cv-03638- RS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; SAN FRANCISCO ORDER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, Defendants-Appellees. Filed October 13, 2020 Before: Ronald M. Gould, Carlos T. Bea, and Michelle T. Friedland, Circuit Judges. Order; Dissent by Judge Collins 2 PAKDEL V. CITY & CNTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO SUMMARY * Civil Rights The panel denied on behalf of the court a petition for rehearing en banc in an action…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Knick v. Township of ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pakdel v. City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Hoffman Brothers Harvesting, Inc. v. County of San JoaquinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Pakdel v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022